Педофил ли е Йосиф?: Разлика между версии

Педофил ли е Йосиф? (преглед на кода)

Версия от 13:37, 29 ноември 2017

446 байта добавени , 29 ноември 2017

редакция без резюме

[проверена версия]

Damaskin

Бюрократи, Редактори, em-bypass-2, Рецензенти, Администратори

5914

редакции

@@ Ред 1: / Ред 1: @@
-[[File:Joseph-Mary.jpg|thumb|136px|right|A modern Christian depiction of Joseph and Mary by Brother Claude Lane, O.S.B., a monk of Mount Angel Abbey]]
+[[File:Joseph-Mary.jpg|thumb|136px|right|Модерно християнско изображение на Йосиф и Мария от Клод Лейн, О. С. Б., монах на абатството на връх Ангел]]
-This article [[Refutations|refutes]] the claim that Joseph, the husband of Mary (the mother of [[Jesus]] Christ), was a [[Islam and Pedophilia|pedophile]], a popular yet erroneous [[Tu Quoque|tu quoque]] argument used to defend Prophet [[Muhammad]]'s pedophilic [[marriage]] to [[Aisha]].
+Тази статия опровергава твърдението, че Йосиф – съпругът на Мария (майката на Иисус Христос), е бил педофил – един погрешен, но популярен сред мюсюлманите „tu quoque“ (“ти също“) аргумент, използван от тях, за да оправдаят педофилския брак на Мухаммад с  [[Аиша бинт Абу Бакр|Аиша]].
-==Joseph==
+==Йосиф==
-===Mary married 90-year-old Joseph when she was only 12, so Joseph was a pedophile too===
+===Мария се е омъжила за 90-годишния Йосиф, когато е била само на 12 години, следователно Йосиф също е бил педофил===
-Everyone who makes this claim, cite the same New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia page.<ref>Charles Souvay - [{{Reference archive|1=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08504a.htm|2=2011-10-24}} St. Joseph] - The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 8. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910. 24 Oct. 2011</ref> What they do not mention is that this page begins by warning readers, "the apocryphal literature is full of details, the non-admittance of these works into the Canon of the Sacred Books casts a ''strong suspicion upon their contents''".<ref name="Catholic Encyclopedia 1">"''The chief sources of information on the life of St. Joseph are the first chapters of our first and third Gospels; they are practically also the only reliable sources, for, whilst, on the holy patriarch's life, as on many other points connected with the Saviour's history which are left untouched by the canonical writings, the apocryphal literature is full of details, the non-admittance of these works into the Canon of the Sacred Books casts a strong suspicion upon their contents; and, even granted that some of the facts recorded by them may be founded on trustworthy traditions, it is in most instances next to impossible to discern and sift these particles of true history from the fancies with which they are associated. Among these apocryphal productions dealing more or less extensively with some episodes of St. Joseph's life may be noted the so-called "Gospel of James", the "Pseudo-Matthew", the "Gospel of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary", the "Story of Joseph the Carpenter", and the "Life of the Virgin and Death of Joseph".''" - [{{Reference archive|1=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08504a.htm|2=2011-10-24}} St. Joseph] - Charles Souvay, The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 8. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910. 24 Oct. 2011</ref>
+Всеки, който твърди това, цитира страницата New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia.<ref>Charles Souvay - [{{Reference archive|1=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08504a.htm|2=2011-10-24}} St. Joseph] - The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 8. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910. 24 Oct. 2011</ref> What they do not mention is that this page begins by warning readers, "the apocryphal literature is full of details, the non-admittance of these works into the Canon of the Sacred Books casts a ''strong suspicion upon their contents''".<ref name="Catholic Encyclopedia 1">"''The chief sources of information on the life of St. Joseph are the first chapters of our first and third Gospels; they are practically also the only reliable sources, for, whilst, on the holy patriarch's life, as on many other points connected with the Saviour's history which are left untouched by the canonical writings, the apocryphal literature is full of details, the non-admittance of these works into the Canon of the Sacred Books casts a strong suspicion upon their contents; and, even granted that some of the facts recorded by them may be founded on trustworthy traditions, it is in most instances next to impossible to discern and sift these particles of true history from the fancies with which they are associated. Among these apocryphal productions dealing more or less extensively with some episodes of St. Joseph's life may be noted the so-called "Gospel of James", the "Pseudo-Matthew", the "Gospel of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary", the "Story of Joseph the Carpenter", and the "Life of the Virgin and Death of Joseph".''" - [{{Reference archive|1=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08504a.htm|2=2011-10-24}} St. Joseph] - Charles Souvay, The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 8. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910. 24 Oct. 2011</ref>
 According to Wikipedia, apocrypha is defined as "spurious", "of questionable authenticity", and "Christian texts that are not canonical."<ref>[{{Reference archive|1=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocrypha|2=2011-10-24}} Apocrypha] - Wikipedia, accessed October 24, 2011</ref> Thus they can be considered as the Christian equivalent of da`if (weak) or maudu [[List of Fabricated Hadith|(fabricated) hadith]].